Production reads use curated sources and human-approved claims. When two sources assert incompatible values, both claims stay linked until a curator chooses a resolution. That behaviour is deliberate: a tidy map that hides the disagreement would be less accurate than a map that shows it.

What you get

  • Provenance is stored, not implied Official releases and news reports remain attached to the claims drawn from them.
  • Extraction does not publish itself Automated extract stays off in production until the design for it is accepted. What the public sees has been approved by a person.
  • Contradiction is a state, not a bug to hide Incompatible claims stay linked until a curator chooses one side, the other, or neither.

How we work

  1. Take the source

    Official documents, government notices, news, and papers are the inputs.

  2. Review the claim

    A curator approves or rejects it. Rejected material does not become a public read.

  3. Resolve or keep the conflict

    If sources disagree, both claims remain until a person marks the outcome.

Deliverables

  • Curated entity schemas
  • Human-approved datasets
  • A conflict state the public map can show
Case studies

Related work

Contact

Write to Diaphana

For questions about the published work, or about software in the same line, write to [email protected].